Post-modernism sounds so "eighties". Surely we are in the Post-post-modernism era by now? You know... the one where meaning is defined by it's label, not it's content?

You say its the death of the label, yet label it pomosexuality. Perhaps there are multiple definitions of label that I am unaware of.

Well, whatever floats yer boat. I personally have always identified as a man who loves men,
as "G" not "GBT"
and have not perceived fluidity or even mutability in my sex attractions. It's a little like this
"we are all bisexual" cant that went around a couple of decades ago. No doubt it resonates
for some people sometimes, but not for all of the people all of the time, and never in my own experience.

I'm definately curious, however, I looked at the web site and thought, "this is a attempt at creating a trend". I am queer, was queer when I was 13 and people called me a queer. They knew I was a queer because I was already different, not on the basis of sucking cock or anything physical, but on the basis of being different. I like being queer. Being queer has it's limitations in some circles however, as some people seem to think that queer is gay. If not gay, then a person must be bisexual. I did not like pansexuality because it seemed an escape from queer and suggested straightness. I am queer and everything I have eve done has been queer. I prefer men and never feared the touch of a bold desirous female spirit, but even that was queer to my way of thinking, because queer has nothing to do with being normal. I don't consider myself perverted, but I seek pure pleasure where it is to be found, and for me pleasure easily moves beyond the physical limitation of body into the ethereal sphere of mind and spirit. I am queer. In a post modern world, I guess you could call it pomo, as I looked up this abbreviation, sexuality. My queerness however is not completely defined my my sexuality. It is partly a matter of my taste in art, in aesthetics, in dialogue, in being curious and indulgent. Perhaps I am a post modern creature, but I have even wondered in literature about this phrase. Robert Anton Wilson seeks to engage dialogue on the phrase postmodernism, as how can we really unequivocally state we are post modern. Where is modernity to be found? If we are post modern, has modernity been relegated to the past, rendering it historic. And what would someone term pre-historic? Before history? According to the Diamond Sutra, the Buddha cannot be found according to the thirty two bodily characteristics or be sought in sound, further as there is no body, mind, spirit, being to be found, where is Buddha to be found. Where is pomosexuality to be found. Have we ever really lived in a modern time. How have we moved past a modern age when we are still caught up in the mind trap of war and suffering, hunger and greed? I am so queer that I venture to say, all I really want is the embrace of another that is so moving and deep as to forget all sight, sound, smell, touch, and other sensation, and unfold together in eternal bliss. Perhaps I am seeking tantric partners who are willing to let go of labels all together and explore without attachment the nature of existence. I am currently separated from people in many ways. I don't have a male or female spirit for companionship, and few people care to endure my sensitive nature and desire to practice what I talk about, that is how to live in peace without being hung up on desire objects. If there is to be a post modern world, perhaps sexuality will be the centerpiece of it as the world engages in an embrace that is beyond fear, jealousy, revenge, and anger. How many guys have demanded I fuck them just so, in exactly the way they wish, without consideration for being able to go into a deeper expression of being. What can I say? The demands we place upon each other as objects of desire have limited our relationships with the eternal that is found only when we attempt to love for he sake of love and for no other selfish reason. Words hardly can convey my feelings.